And now, with a keystone victory over the UNCW Seamen at Easterns, they have established themselves as a threat for a quarterfinals victory at Nationals. And most people couldn’t name more than one of them.Īlthough Bloodthirsty entered the season with little fanfare, their results have garnered attention and respect. Yet somehow this group, this faceless five, has achieved. They arrived at Stanford with determination, passion, and little else. None has been named to an all-region team, not even the second team. This year the team rests of the shoulders of its five seniors. It is clear how Stanford has reacted it is led by players that faced this heartbreak and chose to fight back. Faced with that disappointment, you can either give up or you can dig in and work your hardest. Losing by just a point in the game-to-go hurts having it happen twice in a college career is nearly heartbreaking. For the second time in three years, Stanford’s season ended at the hard cap in the game-to-go. Despite a season of hard work and growth, a trip to Nationals was not to be. By the time Southwest Regionals rolled around, they had bootstrapped themselves into a top team, facing UCSB’s Black Tide in the finals. Early season adversity and losses slowly gave way to experience and successes. They struggled to hit their stride, relying on a younger cast of players. Last season was an uphill slog for Stanford. And this year it seems that Stanford has remembered how to win. Stanford Bloodthirsty has been building over the past three years after finishing in the middle of the pack at Regionals in 2012. They say that the best way to learn how to win big games is to lose big games. This preview comes from guest author Dan Silverstein, coach of University of California Ugmo. How much higher can Stanford climb? Apby Guest Author in Preview with 0 comments Photo: Rodney Chen. shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/ organisation directly or indirectly.Bloodthirsty's class of seniors has proven that hard work and effort is enough to become a top ten team. ĭisclaimer: The views expressed are solely of the authors and does not necessarily subscribe to it. Sandeep Sehgal, Director-Tax and Regulatory, AKM Global About the Author: Sandeep Sehgal is Director- Tax and Regulatory, AKM Global, a tax and consulting firm with inputs from Yeeshu Sehgal, Senior Associate, AKM Global. Since any discrepancy/ambiguity may lead to unfavourable assessment for the company. In such times, it is highly imperative for CFOs of the company to look into their submissions carefully. Further, personal hearing opportunity must be given, wherever asked, for by the taxpayers before passing an assessment order. Proper systems must be put in place to ensure the accountability of the officers passing the order. The Income Tax Portal should be working properly and the information technology should be sufficient to meet any excess traffic which mainly occurs at the time of passing an assessment order. However, certain minimum requirements should be met to make it more effective such: With that expectation, this regime was generally appreciated initially by the taxpayers. It is always a welcome move to bring change in a process or make it automated for it to work more smoothly. Moreover, Language barriers may be faced by the taxpayers as sometimes businesses may submit their response in a local language which officers may not understand. There have been instances where tax submissions have been ignored or not taken into account/missed out during faceless assessment. There have been instances where assessment has been completed without issuing Show Cause Notice/Draft Assessment Order which, in addition to being in contravention of provisions of s.144B, also violates the principles of natural justice.Īdditionally, in most of the cases, Draft Assessment Orders have more or less, have turned out to be the final assessment orders, as the objections/ submissions filed by the assesses in response to such orders have been altogether ignored and disregarded by the faceless income tax authorities. When accountability is known at the time of passing of an order, only then the principles of natural justice can be adhered to in true spirit. Technical glitches in the income-tax portal lead to difficulties in filing responses and submissions.įurthermore, accountability is jeopardized highly by this scheme as there will not be any accountability for any omissions or mistakes committed by the officials. There are several concerns with respect to faceless assessment scheme. Faceless assessment: Challenges CFOs face
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |